| | https://s3.amazonaws.com/2022nudist/nudists-sex.html and often painful emotions of happiness,
pain, shock, or shame the sight of the nakedbody
arouseswere used by artistsin many methods. Nakedness
was, and still is, always something specific. It can
signify divinity, or reveal human helplessness. Most
Striking is the magic of the erect male genitals,
which accounts for the survival of the apotropaic
image of the phallus into Classical times, on the herm
and the satyr and in Old Comedy.
I have attempted to illustrate some aspects of the representation of nakedness,partial and complete,for men
and for women, in Greece, and in the barbarian
world; to interpret some of the historical reports, and
to "read"some of the images, in the Greek arty
language, in addition to in some quite queer barbariandialects. There are obviously issues of translation,
Frequently involving our own understandingof the nude
the painterZeuxis,was describedby Lucian.Zeuxis:see
Robertson413, 488. Barbarianprisonerson Roman
trophiesarefrequentlyaccompanied
bytheirwives,whoare
nursingbabies.
148 Suprans. 3, 9-12, 91.
to Psychoanalysis(orig. English publ. 1920; rev., repr. Awesome
York 1964) 160: "The variety of things which are repre-
sentedsymbolically
in dreamsis notgreat. The humanbody
as a whole, parents,children,brothersand sisters,arrival,
Departure, nakedness....
(Boston1971).
149
Suprans.9-10, 38. AmongrecentstudiesseeL. di Stasi,
569
figure in art. We often think of it as mostly sensual.
Eros certainly goes behind the sight of the nude
human body, but its sexual significanceis not the only
one in artwork. Actually, when it is only eroticits significance is
least strong. The Aphroditeof Euripides'Hippolytus, with all her awesomepower, was fully dressed. In
Greece the remarkable initiation of fit man
nudity, which certainly originated in a rite, spiritual
Circumstance, developeda specific societal and civic meaning.
the gymnasia marked guys's status as citizens of the
On the vases, this is how young
Guys were shown.
Female figuresshown nakedin people, on the other
hand, were typically entertainers. Women depicted
as exposed were broken, stripped of their clothes,
and in dreadfuldanger,as vulnerableand unguarded
before a male attacker as Athenian law conceived
Clothing differentiates guys from
animals. This distinction remains valid in Classical
Greek art for girls (thoughnot for guys). Polyxena,
and Iphigeneia, nude by the altar, are about to be
sacrificedlike creatures.
The perspective of nakedness among barbarians differs,
often contrasting sharply with that of mainland
Greece in the Classical period, and permits US to see
more certainly, perhaps,just how unique the Greekconcept and customwere. https://s3.amazonaws.com/2024nudism/mature-beach-sex.html and Romans made a
variety of adjustmentsto include-in a small waythe classical ideal of Greek male nudity and of the
gymnasia in their artwork and in their life. The Gauls' custom of fightingnakedwas remarkedon as "foreign"by
the Greeks. In https://s3.amazonaws.com/2024nudism/public-beach-nudity-sex.html , and in Italy, female nudity
and the picture of the nursing mother still mark the
power of the mothergoddess,as they did in the Mediterraneanbefore Greek art predominated.
In Classical antiquity, so, the contrast between the clothed and the nude human body was
used to express some of the most fundamental contrastsof the
human encounter:God and man, human and creature,
man and girl, public world and privatelife
Cultural studies practitioners have long debated the signication of clothes and
the methods in which they signify sensuality, sexuality, status, as well as the ethics
and codes of creation of clothes, consumption, the operations of thoughts of
belonging in the subscription to fashion trends -- all in all, the manners in which
Garments represents. Investigations of garments and fashion have frequently treated the
'Nude' body as if it is prior to representation other than in its depiction in art,
Porn, advertising and other media. The arguments in art history and public
World parlance over the differences between naked and bare are moot points
when viewed through a poststructuralist lens. Kenneth Clark (1956) suggests
that artistic portrayal -- high art -- has the ability to render the naked as nude,
as if 'nude' is another kind or style of clothes, leaving behind 'naked' as the actually
disrobed. Treating the nude body in this way ignores how it's consistently already
Signified and constrained by codes of behavior, contexts, distinction from
the clothed body, loose signications and cultural rites. Although nakedness is
| | | |
|
